Not simply pretending that everything will be alright and focussing on delivering good news, but honestly acknowledging difficult circumstances and stressing the capability of those involved to face up to them. This means taking a proactive, optimistic approach to difficult situations, but tempering that with realism and rationality. In the past few months we’ve developed and run very popular sessions on leading with ‘bounded optimism’. What’s emerged from participant feedback on courses we’ve delivered recently is how much people appreciate realism from their leaders. Nobody likes delivering bad news, of course everyone would rather pass on a positive message if they could but allow yourself to be associated with too many over-hopeful and subsequently broken promises, and you’ll start to lose credibility pretty quickly. It came, of course, from the man who stressed that schools were ‘safe’ on January 3 rd, and then swiftly announced their closure, also on January 4 th.
This was greeted with sceptical groans in my household when we heard it on January 4 th, and I suspect that lots of people around the country felt the same way. Maybe that explains his pledge to vaccinate (‘with a fair wind’) over 13 million people in the UK by the middle of February. His brand – similar to that of his erstwhile ally Donald Trump – relies on being associated with good news and optimism. Johnson’s positive outlook has often been commented on, and he’s made a point in the past of setting himself and his government – in the context of Brexit – against the ‘doubters, doomsters and gloomsters’ who had expressed reservations about his proposed course of action. A coronavirus bingo card is currently doing the rounds on social media, populated with the phrases Johnson likes to use in his prime ministerial addresses – and it’s notable how many of them (‘alas’, ‘it’s with a heavy heart…’) relate to how painful it is for him personally to have to pass on difficult messages. What’s contributed to this indecisiveness? Fears for the economic consequences, certainly, combined with quickly changing circumstances (the government hoped to stick with the old tier system until the new Covid variant made it plain that they had to take more drastic action) an ideological reluctance to be seen to be telling people what to do, and restricting their civil liberties and related concerns about a possible vote of no confidence in the government led by restive Conservative backbenchers.īut another factor relates more particularly to Boris Johnson: he doesn’t like to deliver bad news, or to be associated with it.
Criticism of the decision itself has been relatively muted, bar predictable contributions from the usual suspects but what’s attracting the ire of the opposition and other commentators is the length of time it took for the Prime Minister to make up his mind about what to do. The UK has entered its third national lockdown: the government has acted and parliament has given its consent.
0 kommentar(er)
